A couple of weeks ago, Adam Butler from ReSolve published a white paper called “Managed Futures Carry: A Practitioner’s Guide”. ReSolve AM is Corey Hoffstein’s partner in crime behind the Return Stack concept; they floated on Twitter the idea of stacking carry on top of stocks and I was eager to know more.

My personal relationship with “carry” goes way back: my first real job was try to implement a carry strategy in the FX space and I have been hooked since (I might have mentioned this in another post on this blog but I am too lazy to go and check).

The white paper is well written and researched but it is quite ‘heavy’. Before reading it, I was excited about the possibility to write a post on the topic; after…I fell asleep.

The good news is that they finally launched the related ETF: $RSSY, the Return Stacked US Stocks and Future Yield. With it came a succinct and more digestible guide, which gave me a way better starting point 🙂 So, if you are curious about the ins&outs of how the strategy is built, the white paper is the perfect place to look. If you are just curious, I have taken some graphs from both presentations to give you an hopefully nice overview. All the material that is not related to the white paper can be found here.

What is Futures Yields?

The returns of an asset largely can be decomposed into two sources: (1) price appreciation and (2) yield (sometimes called “carry”).

The second component can be loosely defined as the expected return of an investment assuming no change in its price.  More thoroughly, the second source of return captures the economic benefit of simply holding an asset minus the costs associated with holding it.

Futures yield strategies seek to maximize exposure to this second component of returns.

Sources of Yield

The following table offers detailed examples to better understand the concept of “yield” or “carry”:

If you want to dig deeper, the first section of the white paper is dedicated to this topic. I find the Risk-Based Theory important: carry yields a return (fuuuuucking hell this English language) because investors bear a risk AND because there are other actors in the market that are interested in unloading that risk to someone else. Carry is always an expected return…but do not tell it to the dividend stans.

Futures Yield Strategy

Will invest long and short across commodities, currencies, bonds, and equities via futures contracts using a systematic and quantitative process that seeks to harvest roll yield (carry) in futures contracts.

The strategy can be split in three different approaches: calendar spreads, cross-sectional and time-series carry (see again the white paper for more details). All of them involve a long and a short position: this is essentially to enhance the carry component versus the price-movement one, considering that the price risk is impossible to remove entirely.

Also worth noting: Some markets have a structural negative (gold) or positive (bonds) carry, but this does not lead to constant negative (positive) returns because investors demand (supply) the asset for other reasons. Ah, that lovely inverted yield curve that so much joy brought to my investments in the last few years.

Portfolio Construction

The unfortunate part here is that the volatility target is rather low…because of YOU! Yep, investors would not sustain double that level of volatility, even if they would still be able to target a lower level by simply allocating less…while saving on fees. Single-line item FTW!

Investment Universe

The Goods

All of the above is fine but why should we care? Because carry follows its own path, uncorrelated to our darlings stocks and bonds.

What is even more relevant is in the next 3 graphs:

Carry tends to perform well when stocks and bonds decide to follow Sam Hinkie favourite strategy: tanking.

Having lived through the GFC, when FX carry performed as poorly as stocks, I was a bit surprised by this result. Positively surprised 🙂 I thought that carry was largely a pro-cyclical element, something that would dance at its own rhythm but goes along with stocks when it’s time to cry. I guess this speaks in favour of structuring a strategy in the right way and having a decent level of diversification.

Last but not least, an overview of what can be achieved by mixing together stocks, bonds, trend following and carry:

The fact that you can get there by a simple 50/50 of RSBT and RSSY is magical.

What I am reading now:

Follow me on Twitter @nprotasoni


8 Comments

Mattia · June 3, 2024 at 7:50 am

So basically if we combine RSBT and RSSY we can have a leveraged (implicit) exposure to a stock/bond portfolio + a carry exposure on futures?
what’s the difference between a return stacked strategy stock bond and a carry? the first one offers greater exposure vs the stock market using bond futures (margin) to get an implicit leverage using the free capital unposted as margin to buy more stocks than a 60/40 or a 50/50 and the carry one uses return stacking and daily rebalancing to offer a volatility adjusted carry seeking strategy on futures? is this a good summary?.
allocating 50% on rsbt and 50% on rssy will give you a return stacked all-weather like portfolio?

    TheItalianLeatherSofa · June 3, 2024 at 8:00 am

    if you combine RSBT and RSSY you have:
    50% stocks
    50% bonds
    50% trend
    50% carry
    it is a sort of Permanent Portfolio-ish allocation (you have trend that offers a crisis-alpha feat like cash). it was just an example to show how now it is possible to build capital efficient portfolio with a few building blocks.
    you can always change the weights to get to the desired exposures (I am not sure that I understood your question eheheh. If you do not like trend, you can switch RSBT to IEF and adjust the weights to your target ;))

      Mattia · June 3, 2024 at 8:10 am

      I’m not sure I understood my question either to be fair, thanks for the quick reply, the trend component makes it even better in my opinion. the only problem now it the beautiful Mifid component for us poor italians.

        TheItalianLeatherSofa · June 3, 2024 at 9:10 am

        Yeah I understand the frustration. when I was living in the UK, sometimes I wished I didn’t know that those products existed…blissful ignorance
        I think that @nomadicsamuel (on Twitter) asked the guy behind Outcast Beta if he wanted to participate to his series “how I invest my money”; not sure if he accepted, but in case that would be a good example to see how a fanatic of capital efficiency that lives in Europe deals with it (I’d bet just with a lot of frustration but…you never know eheheh)

MaxDOL · June 4, 2024 at 7:59 am

I still not convince on “Carry” for an equity heavy portfolio unlike Managed Futures.
Although I would be interest if they came up with MF + Carry in a single ETF or an all in one ETF with combination of
50% stocks
50% bonds
50% trend
50% carry
just like you post in the comment.
Is it even possible ?
LOL

    TheItalianLeatherSofa · June 4, 2024 at 8:33 am

    Hi, it is def possible but as things stands now…no one would buy it.
    I think their marketing strategy is to stack a “weird” beta on top of a “standard” one so that the tracking error doesn’t get too far. That’s my understanding.
    there is a vocal community that likes these products but the community is poor eheheheh and the ETF issuers run a business at the end of the day

Amit · June 24, 2024 at 5:21 pm

One thing to note is that the 50/50 split RSBT and RSSY is for US Equities. Unfortunately only RSSB has global equities.

Universa Investments’s case against NTSX (sort of) - · June 16, 2024 at 12:06 pm

[…] between stocks and the interest rate curve being in contango/backwardation? Sort of non-diversified $RSSY? […]

Comments are closed.